|
|
United States-English | |
|
|
 |
|
ProLiant blade servers benchmarks |
|
|
The HP Integrity rx6600, used as the database server, and two HP ProLiant BL460c server blades, used as application and web servers, were utilized in an Oracle-conducted PeopleSoft Enterprise Campus Solution 9 Benchmark measuring the comparative online and batch performance of selected processes. Benchmark results showed, for 6,000 users, an average logon of 0.71 seconds, an average student load center of 0.91 seconds, an average page load of 0.83 seconds, and an average page save of 1.63 seconds. HP is the first vendor to run this benchmark. 06/08 HP ProLiant DL580 G5 with BL460c beats IBM POWER6/POWER5 result in online performance on Oracle E-Business Suite 11i Medium Model Benchmark In March 2008, HP submitted a new result for the HP ProLiant DL580 G5 and three ProLiant BL460c blade servers on the Oracle E-Business Suite 11i Medium Model benchmark. The HP ProLiant servers configured with Quad-Core Intel Xeon processors achieved superior results as compared to the IBM System p570 POWER6 and POWER 5 results in each of the following key measurements:
05/08 HP ProLiant BL685c takes #1 Windows performance on Siebel CRM Release 8.0 Benchmark Industry Applications HP, in conjunction with Microsoft and Oracle Corp., has completed a Siebel 8.0 benchmark on an infrastructure designed to deliver a high-performance and cost-effective solution for midsized users of Siebel software. The tested configuration was built on an HP BladeSystem infrastructure running Windows Server 2003 EE operating system and an Oracle backend database. Completed as part of the CRM 8.0 Platform Sizing and Performance Program (PSPP), this benchmark, validated by Oracle Corp., demonstrated that enterprises requiring 4,700 concurrent CRM application users can confidently deploy their CRM software in a complete HP BladeSystem infrastructure and gain the advantage of an easily-managed, cost-effective infrastructure solution optimized for efficiency and change. The CRM 8.0 performance results were achieved with an HP ProLiant BL685 for the Siebel Application Server, HP ProLiant BL465 for the Siebel Web Server, and an HP rx6600 server configured at the database tier. A single HP ProLiant BL685c blade server with four dual-core AMD Opteron processors Model 8222 (3.0GHz) and 32 GB memory was used as an application server. The application server used 24 GB of memory and maintained CPU utilization of 88%. One HP ProLiant BL465c blade server was used as web server with two dual-core AMD Opteron processors Model 2218 (2.6GHz) and 4 GB memory. The Web and Application Server platforms ran Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition. An HP rx6600 server was used as the database server and had four Itanium 1.6GHz Intel Itanium 2 Dual-Core processors. This compact enterprise solution demonstrates outstanding throughput, processing almost 73,000 complex business transactions per hour. 05/08 HP ProLiant BL460c takes #1 performance on Siebel CRM Release 8.0 Benchmark Industry Applications running Linux, Oracle The HP ProLiant BL460c server blade, configured with 2 x 3.16GHz Intel Xeon X5460 Quad-Core processors with 32GB memory, took the #1 Linux result on Oracle's Siebel CRM Release 8.0 Benchmark with 4,000 users. This result defeated the IBM System x3850 by 14.2% more number of users. The starting price for the HP ProLiant BL460c server blade is also three times less than the Sun SPARC Enterprise T5120, which also ran the Siebel CRM Release 8.0 Benchmark. 05/08 HP ProLiant BL680c G5 with BL480c server blades earn the Top position on Oracle E-Business Suite 11i Medium Model Benchmark for RAC category ProLiant leadership continues with the #1 result on the Oracle E-Business Suite 11i Medium Model Benchmark with the four-socket, Quad-Core ProLiant BL680c G5 and ProLiant BL480c server blades for Fastest Response Time, Orders-to-Catch, and Payroll Batch in the Real Application Clusters (RAC) category. The results defeated SGI's Altix 450 eight-socket, 16-core server results for the above categories and also beat IBM's p570 POWER6/POWER5 four-socket, Dual-Core server's non-RAC results for performance and price/performance. 03/08 HP ProLiant BL465c G5 server blade posts HP’s first Quad-Core AMD Opteron™ blade result on Oracle Applications Standard Benchmark (small model, single DB instance) On March 24, 2008, HP submitted a new result for the HP ProLiant BL465c G5 on the Oracle E-Business Suite 11i Small Model benchmark. The HP ProLiant BL465c G5 achieved superior results as compared to the IBM x3850 in each of the following key measurements:
HP evaluated the performance and energy efficiency of the HP ProLiant BladeSystem c-Class with the ProLiant BL260c G5 and compared results to those from the December 2007 Principled Technologies report on the Dell PowerEdge M600 and the IBM BladeCenter HS21 server blades utilizing the SPECjbb2005 benchmark.1 HP’s comparison of HP’s server blade result and the Principled Technologies report showed that the HP ProLiant BL260c G5 server blade attained the highest performance/watt in all configurations run. 03/08 HP ProLiant BL685c G5 Server Blade with new Quad-Core AMD Opteron™ processors takes 4P and 2P x86/64 records on SPEC® CPU2006 benchmark The ProLiant BL685 G5 with the AMD Opteron™ processor Model 8356 achieved four new records on the SPEC® CPU2006 benchmark. The HP ProLiant BL685c G5 server blade achieved the following leadership four-processor and two-processor results:#1 4P x86/64 SPECfp_rate_base2006, #1 4P x86/64 SPECfpÒ_rate2006, #1 2P x86/64 SPECfp_rate_base2006, #1 2P x86/64 SPECfpÒ_rate2006. 03/08 HP ProLiant DL585 G5 with new Quad-Core AMD Opteron™ processors takes #1 4P worldwide price/performance record on TPC-C benchmark HP announced new record-breaking results on the TPC-C benchmark for the HP ProLiant DL585 G5 on March 31, 2008. The HP ProLiant DL585 G5, configured with 4 x 2.3GHz Quad-Core AMD Opteron™ Model 8356 processors (4 processors/16 cores/16 threads) with 2 MB Cache and 128 GB DDR2 main memory, achieved 402,234 tpmC @ USD$1.26/tpmC running Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise x64 Edition operating system and Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Enterprise x64 Edition SP2 database. The results represent a 52.9% performance improvement on Quad-Core processors compared to the DL585 G2 Dual-Core result. The DL585 G5 result with the new Quad-Core processors achieved the top 4P price/performance at less than half the cost of the closest competitor, is #7 on the Top Ten TPC-C price/performance list, is the only 4P server result on that list, and brings the number of HP servers on the Top Ten TPC-C price/performance list to 5. 03/08 HP ProLiant servers show excellent performance scalability with new Quad-Core AMD Opteronä processors on two-tier SAP® Sales and Distribution (SD) Standard Application Benchmark The HP ProLiant DL385 G5 and HP ProLiant BL685c G5 achieved outstanding performance in the first Quad-Core AMD Opteron results posted for HP on the two-tier SAP SD Application Benchmark, showing excellent scalability of HP ProLiant AMD Opteron-based servers moving from dual-core to quad-core processing and comparative performance providing quality choices for customers. The ProLiant DL385 G5 achieved 2,102 SAP SD Benchmark users, equivalent to a throughput of 210,330 fully processed order line items per hour or 10,520 SAPS. The ProLiant BL685c G5 achieved 3,524 SAP SD Benchmark users, equivalent to a throughput of 353,300 fully processed order line items per hour or 17,650 SAPS. 03/08 HP ProLiant BL680c G5 server blade takes world record for excellent performance for four-processor server on three-tier SAP® SD Standard Application Benchmark with Microsoft Windows 2008 The HP ProLiant BL680c G5 server blade delivers no-compromise performance and expansion as the first Quad-Core 4P BladeSystem Server. The server blade showed an outstanding performance on the three-tier SAP SD Standard Application Benchmark with a result of 34,000 SAP SD Benchmark users and 170,200 total SAPS, earning the #1 position for a four-processor server on the three-tier SAP SD Standard Application Benchmark. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 Printable version |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
